<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: OOAD 101 Lesson 4: Understanding cohesion</title>
	<link>http://sonjayatandon.com/04-2006/ooad-101-lesson-4-understanding-cohesion/</link>
	<description>...tales of a software curmudgeon</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 23:32:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Sonjaya Tandon &#187; FRAMEWORK 101: Building XCF - Lesson 02 - Request Processing</title>
		<link>http://sonjayatandon.com/04-2006/ooad-101-lesson-4-understanding-cohesion/#comment-150</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2006 00:41:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://sonjayatandon.com/04-2006/ooad-101-lesson-4-understanding-cohesion/#comment-150</guid>
					<description>[...] In XCF Version 5, these actions were accomplished with three separate sub-systems. It turns out that that was a design error. From a cohesion point of view, the behaviors were sliced to thin. (For more on cohesion, see the OOAD lessons). That is XCF 5 has too many objects to represent these actions. The mistake was in viewing these actions as three different things. They are really one thing, and that is request processing. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] In XCF Version 5, these actions were accomplished with three separate sub-systems. It turns out that that was a design error. From a cohesion point of view, the behaviors were sliced to thin. (For more on cohesion, see the OOAD lessons). That is XCF 5 has too many objects to represent these actions. The mistake was in viewing these actions as three different things. They are really one thing, and that is request processing. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
